Is Government Ban on Tobacco Wrong Essay - 1010 Words

Introduction: Government passes law to the society to prevent the risk factor that is of significant harm to their health or life. Some of those activities that cause risk are drinking and driving, use of dangerous weapons. We notice that these activities pose a risk to others who are not engaged in these activities. But there are activities that pose a danger to the participant who engage in them. For example, drinking, smoking, rock climbing. Since all states follow freedom, the state cannot pass laws that forbid consenting adults from participating in such activities just because they cause harm to them. A person engaging in an activity with full knowledge of the risks involved is morally justified. It is morally wrong to get†¦show more content†¦Consent is defined as to express an approval or voluntary agreement or permission for some act. For example, people who commit suicide come under this category as well. They know that they are going to die by doing such activity. So that act is done with full knowledge of the individual. Is there any way that state can stop such act? I think the answer is no. Can we go to each family member in the society to do counseling, to find out what is in their mind? In such cases there is nothing the state can do to stop such act. Thus smokers are consenting adults. They engage in smoking knowing the consequences, which is similar to suicide. Hence, there is no need to pass a law for something that happens or something that is done knowing the risk factors. But in case of people inhaling the smoke, for example, people exposed to others smoking for a long period of time. They are exposed to smoke indirectly and are affected by diseases such as lung cancer and heart diseases. State thus has the right to protect such people. They have the right to stop smokers from polluting the society and causing harm to others who are not smoking. By considering such cases it is morally permissible for state to pass law against smok ing in public places. Criticism: Premise 1 says that state has no business passing laws that forbid knowledgeable and consenting adults from engaging in activities that pose riskShow MoreRelatedThe Argument Against Ban On Tobacco Related Advertising850 Words   |  4 PagesWRITTEN ASSIGNMENT: UNIT 4 – ETHICS CASE STUDY The arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco related advertising in India are plentiful. First, proponents of the ban assert that the state has the right to intervene in the name of public health. Second, there are other precedents for dangerous or potentially dangerous products’ advertising being restricted such as firearms or pharmaceuticals. Third, tobacco related deaths are projected to increase over the next few years and we need to take actionRead MoreBan On Tobacco By The Government Of India1078 Words   |  5 PagesBAN ON TOBACCO BY THE GOVERMENT OF INDIA INTRODUCTION According to Brown Williamson Tobacco Corporation â€Å"From an ethical standpoint, it would be wrong to try to cause people to take the risk of smoking. But even beyond the moral issue, for a product such as cigarettes well known to have serious health risks, it would be difficult even to understand how an advertising campaign could be devised to convince people to smoke. India s tobacco problem is very complex; the quote above depicts how ethicallyRead MoreGovernment Of Indi Ban Tobacco Advertisements Essay910 Words   |  4 PagesGovernment of India to Ban Tobacco Ads The Government of India pursued to create a mechanism to ban Ads on Tobacco usage. In doing so, it raised ethical concerns and arguments from two different sides, those in favor of and against it. For instance, Suhel Seth, CEO of Equus Advertisement, made a strong differing statement such as â€Å"The ban does not have teeth. It is typical Knee-jerk reaction by any Government to create some kind of popularity for itself.† Mr. Seth thought the Government was not seriousRead MoreTobacco Products And Its Effects On Children And Young Adults954 Words   |  4 PagesIn an effort to discourage the consumption of tobacco products in India, a ban was issued stopping advertising and sponsoring of sporting events. This ban was brought to the table with the intentions of keeping the citizens of India from undue influence towards the use of a product that when used to the satisfaction of its producers would result in major health issues and eventual death. The use of tobacco products is directly attributable to the deaths of 3 million people in 1990 and the eventualRead MoreBan Advertisements On Tobacco Usage Essay903 Words   |  4 PagesThe Government of India sought to create a mechanism to ban Ads on Tobacco usage. In doing so, it raised ethical concerns and arguments from two different sides, those in favor of and against it. For instance, Suhel Seth, CEO of Equus Advertisement, made a strong differing statement such as â€Å"The ban does not have teeth. It is typical Knee-jerk reaction by any Government to create some kind of popularity for itself.† Mr. Seth thought the Government was not serious enough to endorse Tobacco Ads prohibitionRead MoreThe Ban On Tobacco Advertising987 Words   |  4 PagesOn Feb 6, 2001, Government of India announced a bill banning Tobacco Companies from advertising their products and sponsoring sports and cultural events. The objective was to discourage adolescents from consuming tobacco products and also arm the Governme nt with powers to launch an anti-Tobacco Program. Summarize the arguments for the ban on tobacco advertising in India. Advocates of free choice opposed to these prohibitions, saying these amounted to unwarranted intrusion by the state into theRead MoreTobacco Advertising And Its Influence On The World971 Words   |  4 Pagessilently into the night is the influence of tobacco advertising and its influence on the populous. Recently to join the discourse was the government of India versus the tobacco conglomerates. The Indian government hopes to follow suit of many other nations including: France, Finland, Norway, Canada and New Zealand who already imposed bans on cigarette advertising with successful results. The tobacco industry, however, holds their position that by placing a ban on advertising is controlling the opinionRead MoreEssay on Public Smoking Ban1091 Words   |  5 PagesUnited States Surgeon General Richard Carmona stated the nearly 126 million nonsmokers are exposed to secondhand smoke (Report: Ban smoking in public places). The risk of inferior health caused by smoking in public estab lishments is truly intolerable. The banning of smoking in public places everywhere should be imposed because it would reduce the risk of health problems of non-smokers, it could reduce the number of smokers all together, and, therefore, reduce the amount of valuable money taxpayersRead MoreShould Cigarette Smoking Be Banned?824 Words   |  3 Pages Introduction: Tobacco Humans have been using tobacco in one way or the other since ancient times. Use of doesn’t always imply smoking it, but it can be chewed or used in different forms such as Tobacco chewing, dipping tobacco, etc. History: There is no fix time for the start of the use of tobacco in humans but it has been in human use since very ancient times. Locals were using before the arrival of Europeans to Americas. Las Casas brilliantly describes in his journal what the scouts who firstRead MoreShould Smoking Be Legal?995 Words   |  4 Pagesor sever a major artery keeping society operating. Whether you believe smoking bans are a slippery slope to a nanny state or the first priority to preventing needless deaths, there are important things to know about both sides of the argument. Tobacco smoking is unquestionably a large problem. In Australia, 1034 cigarettes per adult are consumed and 18,000 deaths are caused every year. Worldwide, deaths from tobacco equal murder, fatal accidents, diabetes, suicide and more preventable deaths combined